LinkedIn outreach
ROI calculator
See the pipeline your volume
can realistically produce.
Reply rates default to Belkins' 2026 study of 15.1 million touchpoints: 7.9% cold, 12.2% warm. The volume you can safely send is capped by LinkedIn, not by your tool, so raising the daily number is the fastest way to make this model lie to you.
We do not store your credentials or your data. This calculator does not even need them: it runs entirely in your browser, so nothing you type is sent to us. See the privacy policy.
Vendor calculators tend to assume a 60% acceptance rate and a 20% reply rate, which produces a number nobody reaches. This one defaults to figures from published studies, so the output is a floor you can plan against.
Belkins measured 7.9% on cold connect-then-message and 12.2% on warm across 15.1 million touchpoints in 2026. If a tool promises you 25%, ask what it counted as a reply.
Roughly 100 invitations a week is the practical ceiling. Turning the daily number up is the fastest way to make this model lie to you, and the fastest way to get the account restricted.
Warming a prospect first moves the reply rate by about half again. Doubling your send volume does not, because the cap arrives first.
Targeting moves acceptance more than any wording change. Trigger-based notes accept at 50 to 60% against 15 to 25% for generic ones, per LeadRiver's analysis of more than 50,000 requests.
A prospect who has seen you before replies at 12.2% instead of 7.9%. That is the single largest multiplier in the model, and it costs no extra sends.
A real signal beats a merge field. The message that could only have been written for that person this week is the one that gets answered.
BeReach finds the people worth reaching, qualifies them against your ideal customer, and drafts the first message from their real, recent context. You approve every message before anything sends, and the research half needs no LinkedIn account connected at all.
Between 30% and 37% for B2B outbound, based on LeadRiver's April 2026 analysis of more than 50,000 requests. Above 40% is genuinely good and usually means tight targeting. Below 20% is a warning sign: it suggests the list is wrong, and it puts the account at risk.
Belkins' 2026 study of 15.1 million touchpoints found 7.9% on cold connect-then-message and 12.2% when messaging someone you are already connected to. Expandi's 2026 report puts the platform average at 10.3%, against the 5.1% Belkins figure it quotes for cold email. Belkins has since restated that benchmark at 0.45% measured against total sends.
Roughly 100 a week is the practical ceiling before LinkedIn starts restricting accounts, so about 20 a working day. The limit is enforced by LinkedIn, so no tool can raise it, whatever the pricing page says.
Usually volume is being used to compensate for targeting. Because the send ceiling is fixed, the only lever that genuinely moves cost per meeting is reaching better-fit people and warming them first.
Click a button and let your favorite AI weigh in.
