Ed-Tech lead generation that finds decision-makers.
BeReach reads the public signals ed-tech companies leave, like funding rounds, school and university pilots, app store traction and hiring for curriculum and growth roles. It qualifies each account against your ICP, then helps you reach the right person with a warm, contextual message.
1,000+ teams4.9| # | Name | Conn | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Nora Bennett CEO · Learnly | 2nd | Liked the post |
| 2 |  Diego Herrera VP Product · Scholaris | 2nd | Commented |
| 3 |  Amara Okoye Head of Growth · Tutora | 3rd | Commented |
| 4 | Julian Frost Founder · Mindpath | 2nd | Reposted |
| 5 | Wei Lin Partnerships · Edunova | 3rd | Liked the post |
Public signal sources
funding, pilots, app stores, hiring
Typical acceptance rate
warm, contextual first touch
Typical reply rate
vs generic cold outreach
To a qualified list
any stage, any segment
Your agent scans where these accounts actually show up: funding and launch data, reviews and traction, tech stacks, hiring posts, and the people behind them.
Every account is scored against your ideal profile on size, stage, traction and buying signals, so noise is filtered out before it ever reaches you.
For each qualified account, the agent finds the right decision-maker and helps you send a contextual message that references a real signal, not a generic template.
Know exactly when an ed-tech company raises, who led it, and how much. A freshly funded team is scaling content, distribution and headcount, so you can reach them while the budget is fresh and the roadmap is being set.
A district, school or university pilot signals a company proving its model and preparing to scale. Time outreach to the moment a team is expanding from a pilot to a rollout and shopping for the tools and partners that support it.
Education chart rank and review growth reveal which learning apps are gaining real adoption. Lead with genuine relevance to their momentum, not a cold pitch to a name pulled from a static list.
An ed-tech team posting curriculum, growth or partnerships roles is scaling its reach. Track hiring to find companies in active growth mode, the ones most likely to invest in tooling and partnerships.
BeReach reads the public web in real time, across funding data, pilot and partnership announcements, app store rankings, job boards and public profiles, then cross-references them to surface qualified ed-tech accounts along with the actual decision-maker's name and how to reach them. It's live signal, not a quarterly database dump.
Legacy databases index established firmographics and refresh slowly, so newly funded ed-tech startups and fast-growing learning platforms are under-covered or missing entirely. BeReach searches the real-time sources where these companies actually announce themselves, like funding, pilots and app store traction, so it finds accounts those databases don't have.
Yes. Every lead is built from public signals across the open web, cross-referenced and verified. There's no scraping behind a login and no private database, which is exactly why the coverage of fast-moving ed-tech companies is so much better.
Funding stage and recency, headcount and growth, pilot and partnership activity, app store traction, and hiring for curriculum and growth roles. You describe your ICP in plain language and the agent scores each account against it, so only the strong-fit ones reach you.
Yes, and that's the difference from a list tool. After the Finder surfaces accounts and the Qualifier scores them, the Reacher helps you open a warm, multichannel conversation with the right person, referencing a real signal like a recent raise or a new district pilot instead of a generic template.
Yes. Just describe what you want, like a Series A K-12 platform running district pilots hiring a Head of Growth, and the agent handles the combination of stage, segment, pilot and role signals. No filters or boolean syntax to learn.
Usually under two minutes. Describe the accounts you want, the agent scans the public sources, qualifies them against your ICP, and returns a list with named decision-makers ready to reach out to.
The all-in-one AI SDR was supposed to replace your sales team. By early 2026, most companies that tried it have gone back to hybrid models. Here's what AI agents actually do well for LinkedIn prospecting - and where the hype still outpaces reality.
Alexandre Sarfati
Companies doing LinkedIn ABM well generate $10+ in pipeline per dollar spent and 44% higher ROAS than Google. But most ABM on LinkedIn fails because teams treat it like targeted cold outreach. Here's what the data shows actually works.
Alexandre Sarfati
Belkins analyzed over 20 million LinkedIn outreach attempts across 13,000 accounts. Here's what the data says about cold versus warm approaches, which combinations work, and what most teams get wrong.
Alexandre Sarfati
Describe your ideal ed-tech account and let your agent find, qualify, and reach the decision-makers behind it.
Free credits inside · no credit card
Click a button and let your favorite AI weigh in.
