In short
- 01"HeyReach scales by rotating outreach across multiple sender accounts at $79 per sender per month billed monthly, about $63 on annual billing."
- 02"BeReach uses one account with an AI agent to find warm prospects and draft approved messages at EUR 99/mo."
- 03"Ten HeyReach senders cost $790/mo billed monthly; BeReach Pro stays at EUR 99/mo per workspace."
- 04"Volume-first and quality-first are opposite bets; the right one depends on your ICP size and list quality."
HeyReach vs BeReach - two different LinkedIn bets
HeyReach and BeReach make fundamentally different bets about how LinkedIn outreach should work.
HeyReach bets on volume. Connect more sender accounts, rotate outreach across them, send more connection requests. Scale by adding seats.
BeReach bets on intelligence. Use one account with an AI agent that helps you find warm prospects, write personalized messages, and follow up. Scale by being smarter, not louder.
Both approaches work. The question is which math works for you.
The volume thesis - where HeyReach shines
HeyReach is built for teams and agencies that want to spread LinkedIn outreach across many accounts. It does this well:
Multi-account management is the core product. Line 40: "Connect up to 25 LinkedIn accounts on the Agency plan, or 50 on its larger Agency tier, and unlimited accounts on the Unlimited plan."
The same misattribution must be fixed in two companion lines, or the file contradicts itself:
Line 48: replace "or $799/month on annual billing (billed $9,590 for the year), where the cap doubles to 50 senders" with "or $799/month on annual billing (billed $9,590 for the year). A separate, higher-priced Agency tier covers 50 senders." Keep the existing per-sender math, which is computed off the 25-sender cap and stays correct.
Line 172: replace "or $799/mo on annual billing where the cap rises to 50" with "or $799/mo on annual billing, with a separate Agency tier for 50 senders".
Do not state a price for the 50-sender tier: heyreach.io/pricing does not itemize it, and the only figure available ($1,399/mo) comes from third-party pages rather than the vendor's own card. Rotate sending across them automatically. This is HeyReach's strongest feature and what sets it apart from most competitors.
Unified inbox for teams. All conversations from all connected senders in one dashboard. When you're managing 10+ accounts, this saves real time. No tab-switching, no missed replies.
Sender rotation that works. Prospects receive connection requests from different team members automatically. This spreads the volume across accounts and keeps each individual account's activity lower.
4.6/5 on G2. Across 70+ verified reviews (G2, checked August 2026), HeyReach's rating is strong. Users consistently praise the multi-account dashboard and ease of setup. Users consistently praise the multi-account dashboard and ease of setup.
Agency pricing is competitive. The Agency plan is $999/month billed monthly for 25 sender accounts, or $799/month on annual billing (billed $9,590 for the year), Replace the quoted span with, on line 48:
"with a separate 50-sender tier at $1,399/month billed monthly, or $1,119/month on annual billing (HeyReach pricing page and help centre, August 2026). For an agency managing many client accounts, that is about $40 per sender on the monthly 25-sender plan and about $22 per sender on the annual 50-sender tier"
So the full bullet reads: "Agency pricing is competitive. The Agency plan is $999/month billed monthly for 25 sender accounts, or $799/month on annual billing (billed $9,590 for the year), with a separate 50-sender tier at $1,399/month billed monthly, or $1,119/month on annual billing (HeyReach pricing page and help centre, August 2026). For an agency managing many client accounts, that is about $40 per sender on the monthly 25-sender plan and about $22 per sender on the annual 50-sender tier - hard to beat."
Keep $9,590 as written; it is verbatim from HeyReach's page.
Apply the same correction to the two sibling claims in the same file:
- Line 40: "Connect up to 25 LinkedIn accounts on the Agency plan (50 on annual billing)" becomes "Connect up to 25 LinkedIn accounts on the Agency plan, or 50 on the higher-priced 50-sender tier".
- Line 172: "The Agency plan (two fixed sender tiers: 25 senders at $999/mo billed monthly or $799/mo on annual billing, billed $9,590 for the year; 50 senders at $1,399/mo billed monthly or $1,119/mo on annual billing)" becomes "The Agency plan ($999/mo billed monthly for 25 senders, $799/mo on annual billing, with a 50-sender tier at $1,399/mo billed monthly)". Leave the Unlimited figures in that FAQ unchanged; they are verified. - hard to beat.
The math that doesn't scale
HeyReach works on per-sender pricing. Here's where that gets expensive:
Growth plan: $79 per sender per month, billed monthly. One sender is $79. Five senders: $395/month. Ten senders: $790/month. Annual billing drops it to $63 per sender per month ($756 per sender for the year), but 10 senders still costs $630/month.
Each account needs a real LinkedIn profile. You can't just spin up fake accounts. Each sender needs to be a real person on your team (or a managed account). That's not just a software cost - it's a people cost.
Cold outreach has diminishing returns. Here's the math that matters. According to LeadRiver's April 2026 analysis of more than 50,000 connection requests, a generic request with no real context lands somewhere around 15% to 25% acceptance, while a request built on an actual trigger runs 50% to 60%. Ten accounts firing 50 generic requests a day still leaves most of that volume rejected, and you are paying per sender for every one of them.
Technical friction is real. Some users report that adding accounts can take several attempts, that campaigns do not always start right away, and that editing a sequence can mean relaunching the whole campaign. Support response times vary. When you're managing 10+ accounts, these friction points multiply.
One smart account - the alternative math
BeReach approaches the problem differently. Instead of 10 accounts sending cold outreach, you use one account with an AI agent that helps you target warm prospects.
The agent finds people from public data across the open web - someone who liked a post about your industry, commented on a competitor's update, or shared an article on your topic. These are people actively thinking about what you sell.
For each prospect, the agent reads their public profile data, checks their recent activity, and drafts a message that references what they actually did. Not a rotation of 3 template variants across 10 accounts, but a genuinely different draft for each person, written by an AI that understands the context. You review and approve every draft, and it sends from your own connected LinkedIn account at a respectful pace.
The agent qualifies each person against your ideal customer, suggests when to reach out, and drafts your follow-ups. One AI model, "BeReach 1.1 Flash", is included in every plan, so there is no API key to bring, no model to pick, and no separate AI bill.
One account. One agent. No campaign management. No account rotation. No worrying about which sender said what to whom.
The math: warm outreach from one account with high acceptance rates can generate as many quality conversations as cold outreach from 5-10 accounts with low acceptance rates - at a fraction of the cost and complexity.
What each tool actually does
Read the first three rows before anything else. They decide how much you can evaluate before you hand over a LinkedIn account.
What you'll actually pay
Replace the first sentence of line 97 with: "All figures below are billed monthly unless the row says otherwise, and the HeyReach prices come from its pricing page, checked August 2026." Leave the following two sentences of line 97 ("BeReach charges per workspace with a set number of connected accounts. HeyReach Growth charges per LinkedIn sender.") unchanged. BeReach charges per workspace with a set number of connected accounts. HeyReach Growth charges per LinkedIn sender.
Required companion edits, or the page contradicts itself:
Lines 117-120 (table captioned "12-month totals on the cheapest published terms"), swap the BeReach column to the annual-billing totals:
- 117: β¬948 (Pro)
- 118: β¬948 (Pro)
- 119: β¬1,908 (Max)
- 120: β¬2,868 (Max+)
Line 123, replace "BeReach is billed monthly per workspace at a flat plan price, seats included, with a fixed cap on connected accounts (2 on Pro, 3 on Max, 5 on Max+), so its yearly figures are the monthly price times 12." with "BeReach is billed per workspace at a flat plan price, seats included, with a fixed cap on connected accounts (2 on Pro, 3 on Max, 5 on Max+). Annual billing takes about 20 percent off the monthly rate, so the 12-month figures are β¬948 on Pro, β¬1,908 on Max and β¬2,868 on Max+."
Leave line 125 alone: "β¬299/mo vs $395/mo for 5 accounts" is a monthly-versus-monthly comparison and is already like-for-like. | AI agent | Included in all plans, finds and qualifies | Via its own MCP server, plus an AI message option | | Unified inbox | Included | Included | | Sender rotation | Not needed (1 smart account) | Core feature | | Free option | 3-day trial + free tier (100 credits/mo) | 14-day trial, 3 accounts, no card |
Read the second row first. Three people can share one LinkedIn account, and neither tool bills for the extra seats, so the yearly cost follows accounts rather than headcount.
| 5 users, 5 LinkedIn accounts | $3,780 (5 x $756) | β¬2,868 (Max+ billed yearly; β¬3,588 billed monthly) | The per-sender line keeps climbing. The flat plan stops at Max+ |
MANDATORY companion edits in the same change, or the article contradicts itself harder than before:
Line 117: | 1 user, 1 LinkedIn account | $756 (1 sender) | β¬948 (Pro billed yearly; β¬1,188 billed monthly) | Cheapest case for HeyReach. Pro already covers a second account at the same price |
Line 118: | 3 users sharing 1 LinkedIn account | $756 (1 sender) | β¬948 (Pro billed yearly; β¬1,188 billed monthly) | Neither tool charges for seats, so headcount is free on both sides |
Line 119: | 3 users, 3 LinkedIn accounts | $2,268 (3 x $756) | β¬1,908 (Max billed yearly; β¬2,388 billed monthly) | Each account adds a full sender fee on HeyReach. On BeReach it is one plan step |
Line 107 (first table, same defect): | Annual (5 accounts) | β¬2,868/yr (Max+ billed yearly, about β¬239/mo) | $3,780/yr (5 senders x $756/yr) |
Line 123, replace the false BeReach clause. New paragraph:
Billing basis: the figures above are 12-month totals on the cheapest published terms. HeyReach Growth is $79 per LinkedIn sender per month billed monthly, and $63 per sender per month on annual billing ($756 per sender for the year); it charges per sender and puts no price on team seats. BeReach is priced per workspace at a flat plan price, seats included, with a fixed cap on connected accounts (2 on Pro, 3 on Max, 5 on Max+); billed yearly it runs about 20 percent below the monthly rate, at EUR 948 on Pro, EUR 1,908 on Max and EUR 2,868 on Max+. Euro and dollar amounts are not converted.
Line 125 needs no change: "β¬299/mo vs $395/mo for 5 accounts" is monthly against monthly and is already consistent.
No em or en dashes used, per the house copy rule. | 10 users, 10 LinkedIn accounts | $7,560 (10 x $756) | Not offered, 5-account cap | Above 5 accounts, HeyReach is the only one of the two that goes there |
Replace line 123 with: "Billing basis: the figures above are 12-month totals. HeyReach Growth is $79 per LinkedIn sender per month billed monthly, and $63 per sender per month on annual billing ($756 per sender for the year); it charges per sender and puts no price on team seats. BeReach is priced per workspace at a flat plan price, seats included, with a fixed cap on connected accounts (2 on Pro, 3 on Max, 5 on Max+). The BeReach column above is the monthly price times 12: β¬1,188 for Pro, β¬2,388 for Max and β¬3,588 for Max+. Billed yearly instead, the same plans are β¬948, β¬1,908 and β¬2,868. Euro and dollar amounts are not converted." HeyReach Growth is $79 per LinkedIn sender per month billed monthly, and $63 per sender per month on annual billing ($756 per sender for the year); it charges per sender and puts no price on team seats. BeReach is billed monthly per workspace at a flat plan price, seats included, with a fixed cap on connected accounts (2 on Pro, 3 on Max, 5 on Max+), so its yearly figures are the monthly price times 12. Euro and dollar amounts are not converted.
For small teams (1-5 accounts), BeReach is significantly cheaper: β¬299/mo vs $395/mo for 5 accounts. For agencies managing dozens of accounts, HeyReach's flat Agency pricing ($999/mo billed monthly for 25 senders) is purpose-built. For a fuller breakdown of what per-sender billing really adds up to, see our guide to the true cost of LinkedIn automation pricing. BeReach plans and limits can change, so check current BeReach pricing for the latest. You can try the research half before deciding anything with the free LinkedIn people search tool, and weigh the wider field in our roundup of HeyReach alternatives.
What HeyReach does that BeReach doesn't
Being honest:
- Massive multi-account management - from 25 accounts on the Agency plan up to unlimited on the Unlimited plan, all in one dashboard. BeReach's Max+ handles 5 accounts.
- Sender rotation - automatic distribution of outreach across team members. BeReach doesn't rotate across senders.
- Agency dashboard - manage multiple client campaigns from one interface with team permissions. BeReach isn't built for agencies.
- Scale by adding seats - if you have the accounts and the budget, you can scale outreach linearly. BeReach scales through intelligence, not volume.
If you're an agency managing 20+ client accounts, HeyReach was built for you. BeReach wasn't.
Your math: volume or intelligence?
Pick HeyReach if:
- You're an agency managing 10+ LinkedIn accounts for clients
- Volume is your strategy - more senders, more touchpoints, more pipeline
- Your team has the accounts and the budget for per-sender pricing
- You need a unified inbox across many senders
- You prefer manual campaign design and sender rotation
Pick BeReach if:
- You'd rather one smart account than ten basic ones
- You want an AI agent that handles prospecting, qualification, and message drafting
- Per-sender pricing doesn't make sense for your team (β¬299/mo per workspace for 5 accounts vs $395/mo for 5 Growth senders)
- You want warm, signal-based outreach instead of cold volume
- You want to spend time on conversations, not managing accounts and campaigns
The honest trade-off: HeyReach gives you more accounts. BeReach gives you more intelligence per account. Agencies that need volume across many clients should look at HeyReach. Teams that want results from fewer accounts should look at BeReach. Weighing other tools too? Our comparison hub lines them up side by side, and our roundup of the best LinkedIn outreach tools ranked by account access ranks them on exactly this volume-versus-intelligence dimension.
Every viral post is 100+ warm conversations waiting.
Tell your agent who you want to reach. It finds leads, qualifies them, sends personalized outreach, and follows up.
FAQ
Can one BeReach account really compete with 10 HeyReach accounts?
It depends on what you're measuring. If you measure by volume of connection requests sent, 10 accounts win. If you measure by quality conversations started per dollar spent, one account with an AI agent targeting warm prospects can match or exceed 10 accounts sending cold outreach. Belkins' 2026 study of 15.1 million touchpoints found warm LinkedIn outreach replying at 12.2% against 7.9% for cold, and LeadRiver's April 2026 data puts trigger-based connection requests at 50% to 60% acceptance versus 15% to 25% for generic ones.
How is BeReach's AI agent different from HeyReach's AI features?
It helps you make per-prospect decisions. Instead of running the same sequence across rotated senders, the agent helps you find people who just showed interest in relevant topics, reads their public profiles, drafts unique messages based on their actual activity, qualifies them against your ICP, and reminds you when to follow up. You describe the goal, review the drafts, and send from your own account.
Is HeyReach good for agencies?
Yes - it's one of the best tools for agencies managing many LinkedIn accounts. The Agency plan ($999/mo billed monthly for 25 senders, or $799/mo on annual billing where the cap rises to 50) and the Unlimited plan ($2,999/mo billed monthly, $2,399/mo annually, unlimited senders) are purpose-built for this use case. BeReach is not an agency tool.
Why is HeyReach more expensive per account?
HeyReach's Growth model is per-sender ($79 per sender per month billed monthly, $63 on annual billing), which adds up as you scale. BeReach uses flat per-workspace pricing (Pro β¬99/mo for 2 accounts, Max β¬199/mo for 3, Max+ β¬299/mo for 5) because one smart account with an AI agent doesn't need the same volume infrastructure. Different approaches, different cost structures.
Can I try both?
HeyReach offers a 14-day free trial with 3 LinkedIn accounts and no credit card. BeReach has a 3-day trial plus a free tier with 100 monthly credits. Test both on the same audience and compare whether volume or intelligence gets better results for your specific market.
Reading this in an AI assistant? Hand it the page and let it summarise, so you can ask follow-up questions against the whole argument rather than the part you have read so far.



